EN
Back to the archive

The archive · Work & Ways of Doing · Operational decision · 1989–1990s

GE's Work-Out town halls make managers decide on the spot — busting bureaucracy

Welch's 1989 Work-Out: employees propose cutting useless work at town meetings where managers must answer immediately — turning complaints into commitments.

General Electric (GE)

The ideaRun 'Work-Out' town meetings where employee teams propose cutting unproductive work and managers answer on the spot — yes, no with reasons, or more data with a deadline.substantial

What it had to solve

By the late 1980s GE had cut people but not work: exit interviews heard 'The people are gone, but the work isn't!', and a commissioned study found only 65% of the company's work added value for customers.

How it works

By the late 1980s, Jack Welch's GE was leaner but meaner. Exit interviews with departing employees surfaced a blunt complaint: 'The people are gone, but the work isn't!' A study Welch commissioned found that only 65% of the work done at GE added value for customers — over a third of the effort was essentially waste. Work-Out, launched around 1989, was his answer to that waste.

Work-Out was a high-involvement, facilitated process. Teams of employees from different functions and levels, supported by a neutral facilitator, identified friction points and proposed killing low-value reports, approvals and meetings. Proposals then went to a 'town meeting,' where the responsible manager had to respond on the spot: yes, no with reasons, or more data with a deadline.

Leadership had to model it first. The head of GE's distribution business took his team on a three-day retreat: day one, list every recurring meeting and abolish the useless ones; day two, list every approval that crossed their desks and push decisions down to where they were actually made; day three, list every report and eliminate those nobody read. Only then did they run town halls across the division.

The program scaled across GE. HBR described Work-Out as an intense, multiyear program through which representatives of GE's 14 businesses meet regularly to identify sources of frustration and inefficiency, and made it the centerpiece of Welch's drive to eliminate unproductive work. Business schools were appointed to work with GE's lines of business, and Work-Out became a textbook example of bureaucracy-busting.

Why it lands

  • The data made it undeniable: a commissioned study showed only 65% of GE's work added customer value, so waste was a fact, not an accusation.
  • Public, on-the-spot decisions converted suggestions into commitments — a manager could not quietly bury a proposal after the meeting.
  • Starting with leaders' own meetings, approvals and reports made the exercise credible before employees were asked to do it.
  • The three categories — meetings, approvals, reports — gave every session a repeatable format instead of a vague mandate to 'improve things.'

What it did

The program scaled across GE's businesses and became the centerpiece of Welch's companywide drive to eliminate unproductive work: HBR described Work-Out as an intense multiyear program through which representatives of GE's 14 businesses meet regularly to identify frustration and inefficiency, and business schools were appointed to work with GE's lines of business, making it a textbook transformation case.

Case pageHBR's Work-Out interview with Jack Welch

What you can take

Force decisions in public, in the room: when a manager must answer yes or no on the spot, employee suggestions become commitments — and leaders learn what their people consider useless work.

Since then

Work-Out became one of the signature practices of the Welch era and a staple of management education; versions of the town-meeting format spread across industries, and consultants still run Work-Out-style sessions today. HBR's 1989 interview presented it as the centerpiece of Welch's effort to revitalize GE's 'human engine' to match its business engine, and the process stayed part of GE's transformation playbook through the 1990s.

Sources

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

Your turn

You just read one. Describe the brief you are staring at, and see who has been given the same problem.

Free account · 3 free questions · no card

Related cases