What it had to solve
Generative image tools reached fashion editorial in 2023, mostly as a threat to photographers. Vogue China's then-editor-in-chief Margaret Zhang commissioned photographer Charlie Engman — who had begun testing AI in his fine-art practice — with the brief 'Into the wild': a step into the imagined that still had to feel like Vogue.
The idea
Shoot the cover for real — model, set, styling — then build the fantasy backdrops in Midjourney and fuse them into the photos: AI extends the craft, not replaces it.
How it works
The fundamentals ran as usual: Chu Wong photographed on a real London set with physical clothing pulls styled by Vivienne Sun, plus hair, makeup and props. Afterward Engman built the backdrops with Midjourney, and post-production studio INK merged the AI 'fantasy scapes' with the photographs so each frame becomes a different world.
What it did
A legacy masthead ran a cover story whose worlds were machine-generated while its people, clothes and lighting were not — one of the most-discussed fashion-editorial AI works of 2023. D&AD awarded it a Yellow Pencil in 2024, and Engman's account of negotiating the tool's constraints became a reference for keeping photographers central as AI entered the craft.
Background
In 2023, generative AI hit fashion photography less as a tool than as a threat, with brands swapping shoots for prompts. Vogue China went the other way. For its August 2023 issue, editor-in-chief Margaret Zhang commissioned photographer Charlie Engman — already known for pushing AI inside his fine-art practice — to shoot cover model Chu Wong with a brief of 'Into the wild': something imagined and new that still felt like Vogue.
The production was deliberately old-fashioned. Engman photographed Wong on a physical set in London, with clothing pulled by stylist Vivienne Sun, a full hair-and-makeup team and real props. Only afterward did the AI enter: Engman generated the surreal backdrops in Midjourney, and post studio INK integrated the machine-built 'fantasy scapes' with the photographs, turning each frame into its own world.
Engman's take, quoted by D&AD, cut against the 'AI can do anything' hype: the tools are full of surprising constraints, and part of the job was making those limits interact with traditional photography in a way that looked exciting. That discipline — keeping the human pipeline intact and letting AI do only what cameras cannot — is why the work stood out. D&AD gave it a Yellow Pencil in 2024, crediting Vogue and the team for pushing contemporary image making while keeping a photographer, a model and a crew at the center.
Why it lands
A masthead's authority rests on craft credibility; outsourcing a whole cover to prompts would have undermined exactly what Vogue sells.
Engman's AI practice meant the tool was treated as a medium with its own grain — constraints to collaborate with, not a shortcut to hide.
Photographing a real model first anchored the images in fashion's core currency: clothing, styling and light that actually exist.
The AI was assigned the one job photography cannot do — impossible landscapes — so the technology added wonder without erasing anyone's job from the credits.
What you can take
When a new image technology arrives, neither panic nor full surrender — decide what must stay real (the model, the clothes, the light) and let the machine build what was never photographable anyway.
Since then
The August 2023 covers became a touchstone in the debate over generative AI in fashion imagery — cited as the workflow that keeps photographers employed while embracing the tools. D&AD honored it with a Yellow Pencil in 2024 and devoted an Annual 2024 'Behind the work' feature to it, with Engman urging other image-makers to treat the technology's limitations as part of the design problem rather than a flaw to hide.
FOLLOW THE EVIDENCE
The sources
- Vogue China dandad.org
- Hyperreal and high fashion – Inside Charlie Engman's AI photoshoot for Vogue China dandad.org
- Charlie Engman for Vogue China ink.studio