EN
Back to the archive

The archive · Public & Social · Strategic decision · 2010–2012

Better Reykjavík: citizens write and vote on policy online — 70k residents, 10,000 ideas

Reykjavík made city policy an open platform: citizens propose, debate and rank ideas, and the council must answer the top ones — over half the city has used it.

City of Reykjavík · Citizens Foundation (Iceland)

The ideaReplace closed council agenda-setting with an open platform where citizens propose, debate and vote on ideas — and the city commits to answer every top-voted one.substantial

What it had to solve

Iceland's 2008 banking collapse destroyed public trust in institutions. In Reykjavík, a comedian's protest party won the 2010 municipal election after writing its policy openly on a new platform, which the city then adopted as its official agenda-setting system.

How it works

After Iceland's banks collapsed in October 2008, trust in politics collapsed with them. Two friends, Róbert Bjarnason and Gunnar Grímsson, started the non-profit Citizens Foundation and, in May 2010, launched Better Reykjavík — an online platform where citizens could propose, debate and prioritize solutions to city problems.

The platform opened a week before Reykjavík's municipal election, and only one party used it: the Best Party, a movement started by comedian Jón Gnarr as a satirical critique of local politics. Supporters used the site to write and rank the party's policy; the Best Party won the election, and Better Reykjavík became the city's official agenda-setting platform.

The design made argument civil: instead of comment threads, every idea has points for and against, which users vote up or down — so the city receives not just a ranked list of ideas but the strongest arguments on each side. Since October 2011 the city adds the top ideas to council committee agendas every month and commits to process and answer them all.

From 2011–2012 the city added participatory budgeting: Better Neighborhoods lets residents in each of the ten neighborhoods propose and vote on how to spend a share of the capital budget, currently around 450M ISK (€3.6M), roughly 4–6% of city capital investment. Over 70,000 of the city's 120,000 residents have taken part, submitting about 10,000 ideas, and hundreds of citizen projects have been built.

Why it lands

  • It gave citizens a binding lever: the council must answer top ideas, and budgets are actually allocated by voters.
  • The debate design (points for/against, no comment wars) kept discussions constructive and useful.
  • It was born from a real trust crisis, so adoption was a response to felt need, not a tech demo.
  • Open source made it replicable — Your Priorities now powers participation in 20+ countries.
  • Participation compounded: each visible built project invited the next round of proposals.

What it did

Over 70,000 of Reykjavík's 120,000 residents have participated, submitting 10,000 ideas and 21,000 debate points; residents steer roughly 450M ISK (€3.6M) of the city's capital budget, and close to 700–800 citizen projects have been built. The open-source model spread to 20+ countries.

Their siteBetter Reykjavík platform

What you can take

Give citizens a real lever, not a suggestion box: when top-voted ideas must be answered and budgets are actually allocated by residents, participation compounds and trust rebuilds.

Since then

Better Reykjavík became a permanent part of Reykjavík governance: monthly council agendas, participatory budgeting and, in 2017, Iceland's first crowdsourced education policy. The open-source Your Priorities software behind it has been used in Estonia — where 50,000 citizens submitted 2,000 proposals, seven of which became law — and in projects across Norway, Scotland, Hungary, Croatia and beyond, and it inspired Madrid's Decide platform. Participation records were set nearly every year, with roughly 12.5% of the city's population voting in annual participatory-budget rounds.

Sources

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

Your turn

You just read one. Describe the brief you are staring at, and see who has been given the same problem.

Free account · 3 free questions · no card

Related cases