EN
Back to the archive

The archive · Work & Ways of Doing · Operational decision · 2006–2015

Buurtzorg runs Dutch home care through 10-to-12-nurse teams with no middle managers

Jos de Blok replaced home-care bureaucracy with self-governing neighborhood teams of 10–12 nurses; care hours and costs fell while satisfaction climbed.

Buurtzorg

The ideaGive each neighborhood team of about 12 nurses full ownership — intake, planning, hiring, budget — and back it with coaches and shared software instead of managers.transformative

What it had to solve

Dutch home care had fragmented into lowest-bidder agencies where nurses spent much of their time on administration; quality and staff morale sank.

How it works

Buurtzorg ('neighborhood care') was founded in the Netherlands in 2006 by Jos de Blok, a nurse who had watched home care degrade under a system where agencies won contracts by bidding low and nurses spent much of their working day on administration. His answer reversed the direction of organization: instead of building care around agencies and managers, build it around the nurses themselves.

Each team of 10–12 highly trained nurses serves 50–60 patients in one neighborhood and is fully self-governing: the team handles intake and care planning, hires its own colleagues, and manages its own budget. There are no managers above the team. Some 15 coaches — themselves mostly experienced nurses — support roughly 700 teams, and a back office of fewer than 50 people handles routine administration. One shared IT system, BuurtzorgWeb, shows every team its workload and its outcomes, so problems surface inside the team instead of in a manager's inbox.

The numbers backed the bet. Ernst & Young found Buurtzorg met patients' needs with 40% of the authorized care hours where other providers used about 70%, with overhead of 8% of costs versus 25%. KPMG's 2015 analysis of similar patients recorded 108 care hours per patient-year versus 168 at other providers, and average home-care costs of €6,428 versus €7,995 — patients needed less care because they recovered independence sooner. Patient satisfaction scored 9.1 out of 10, and Buurtzorg was named the Netherlands' best employer in 2010, 2011 and 2012.

Why it lands

  • Decisions moved to the people who could see the patient, so care became more attentive without adding layers.
  • Keeping hiring and budget inside the team created a peer accountability no manager could replicate.
  • A tiny back office plus shared software let the organization scale without rebuilding the bureaucracy it removed.
  • Fewer care hours did not mean worse care — patients needed less help because outcomes were better.

What it did

KPMG (2015): 108 care hours per patient-year versus 168 elsewhere, average home-care cost €6,428 versus €7,995, patient satisfaction 9.1/10; named the Netherlands' best employer in 2010, 2011 and 2012.

Case pageBuurtzorg's own story

What you can take

Quality collapses where information and authority live apart. Push both down to the smallest unit that can act, and support that unit with tools and coaches instead of managers.

Since then

Buurtzorg scaled from one team to roughly 850 teams in its first decade, and the results held at scale. The model became a global reference point for self-managed care: the Commonwealth Fund published it as a case study in 2015, BMJ Open studied it in 2018, and Jos de Blok advised care systems in Britain and elsewhere. It remains the most-cited demonstration that an organization can grow large without growing managers — which is exactly why it is still the standard answer whenever a health system asks why its frontline staff feel supervised instead of trusted.

Sources

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

Your turn

You just read one. Describe the brief you are staring at, and see who has been given the same problem.

Free account · 3 free questions · no card

Related cases