EN
Back to the archive

The archive · Product Ideas · Strategic decision · 2017–2021

Xiaomi's Kenya Hara logo redesign: 3 years of work, one n=3 curve, 170M Weibo reads

For its 10th birthday Xiaomi spent 20 launch-event minutes on a superellipse n=3 logo — turning a near-identical mark into China's biggest brand talk.

Xiaomi (小米)

The ideaCommission Kenya Hara for a three-year identity project sold as philosophy: the mark comes from the superellipse equation (n=3) and gets an 'Alive' motion logo.substantial

What it had to solve

In 2021 Xiaomi was ten years old and Lei Jun wanted the brand to feel more premium as it expanded beyond phones into AIoT and cars. Hara, art director of MUJI and chairman of Nippon Design Center, had been approached for the redesign since 2017.

How it works

On March 30, 2021, Xiaomi opened its tenth-anniversary spring product launch with the announcement of a new logo designed by Kenya Hara, the Japanese designer who serves as MUJI's art director. Lei Jun admitted the change looked like simply rounding the corners of the old square mark, then spent more than 20 minutes arguing the opposite: the shape and the brand's inner spirit had both changed.

Hara's concept was 'Alive' — technology, he said, evolves toward the forms of life, so the identity should feel living rather than static. To justify the new outline he showed 24 shapes between a square and a circle, derived from the superellipse equation, and explained that the n=3 case struck the perfect balance. The M and logotype were redrawn, black and silver were added to the orange, and the logo was demonstrated moving fluidly across products and scenes.

The near-invisible change became the story itself. The Weibo topic around the new logo exceeded 170 million reads while the launch event's own topic sat near 5 million, and commenters competed to mock the reportedly ¥2 million fee. Advertising critics counter-argued that Xiaomi had bought a story, not a shape, and the debate ran across design and business media for weeks — turning a routine rebrand into a national conversation about what design is worth.

Why it lands

  • A famous designer and a three-year timeline gave the reveal an authority no in-house logo change could claim, so media treated it as news rather than routine.
  • The superellipse equation made a subjective shape sound precise and learnable, giving everyone a concrete detail to repeat, question and meme.
  • Spending 20 minutes of stage time built expectations the subtle design could not meet — and the mismatch itself became shareable content.
  • Keeping the mark recognizable preserved brand equity, so the only thing at risk was the story, which is exactly what the company manufactured.
  • The 'Alive' concept framed the change as a philosophy about technology and life, giving the redesign a meaning beyond pixels that extended to Xiaomi's car and AI ambitions.

What it did

The reveal turned a barely changed square into one of China's biggest design conversations of 2021: the Weibo topic passed 170 million reads versus about 5 million for the launch itself. Netizens memed the rumored ¥2 million fee as a rounded corner, design writers framed it as a masterclass in storytelling, and the 'was it worth it' debate delivered free mass exposure for Xiaomi's tenth-anniversary refresh.

VideoWatch Kenya Hara's logo film

What you can take

When the visual change is tiny, engineer the conversation: a named master, a mathematical formula and the word 'Alive' gave an almost identical logo a story media and memes carried for free.

Since then

The '200万 rounded corner' debate spilled across Weibo, Zhihu, WeChat and design newsletters for weeks, with analysts concluding the real product was the story and the storytelling skill. Xiaomi kept the orange superellipse as its identity across phones, retail and its expanding EV line, and in Chinese marketing circles the case became the standard example of meaning-driven rebranding — proof that a nearly identical logo, wrapped in the right concept and theater, can buy an entire national conversation.

Sources

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

Your turn

You just read one. Describe the brief you are staring at, and see who has been given the same problem.

Free account · 3 free questions · no card

Related cases