The archive · Business Models · Strategic decision · 2008–2019
WeWork: Adam Neumann builds a $47B 'community company' from subleased office space
Lease space wholesale, rent it by the desk with design and flexibility, and sell the business as a tech platform rather than real estate.
WeWork
What it had to solve
Co-working already existed when Adam Neumann and architect Miguel McKelvey started, but flexible offices were treated as a commodity rented like any other space. After the 2008 recession, cheap Manhattan real estate and a wave of laid-off freelancers created the moment to build something bigger — if they could raise enough capital to expand before the market turned.
How it works
WeWork began as a recession experiment. In 2008, architect Miguel McKelvey and entrepreneur Adam Neumann persuaded their Brooklyn landlord to let them divide an empty building into semi-communal offices and rent them out; the space, Green Desk, was an instant hit. They sold their share and opened the first WeWork in 2010 on the corner of Grand and Lafayette, modeled less on a traditional office than on a boutique hotel.
The core business stayed simple: lease space from landlords — the company owned almost no real estate — slice it up, and rent it back in smaller portions with an upcharge for design, happy hours and short flexible leases. What distinguished WeWork from hundreds of co-working rivals was Neumann's insistence that it was not a real-estate business at all. He called it a 'community company' and 'the world's first physical social network', arguing its valuation rested on energy and spirituality rather than a multiple of revenue.
That framing unlocked capital on a scale no co-working rival could match. Neumann raised more than $12 billion in venture funding, capped by SoftBank's $4.4 billion investment in 2017, when Masayoshi Son told him to make the company 'ten times bigger than your original plan'. By the time of the June 2019 profile, WeWork counted 466,000 members in 485 locations, had grown revenue from $75 million in 2014 to $1.8 billion, employed 12,000 people, and become Manhattan's largest tenant and America's most valuable start-up at $47 billion, with an IPO filing underway.
The doubts were as large as the numbers: a $1.9 billion loss, a 'community-adjusted EBITDA' metric that stripped out marketing, construction and design costs — dubbed by the Financial Times 'perhaps the most infamous financial metric of a generation' — and a roughly $44 billion valuation gap with profitable rival IWG, which had three times the locations. Even employees told the reporter they would be happy at half the valuation. Whatever the outcome, the article concluded WeWork had already reshaped commercial real estate, with incumbents and rivals adopting flexible space and shorter leases.
Why it lands
- The spread was real: buy space wholesale on long leases in a downturn, sell it retail by the month with design and flexibility, and capture members who would never sign a traditional lease.
- Repositioning a space business as a community and technology platform escaped real-estate valuation multiples, so growth and story were priced instead of buildings and leases.
- Blitzscaling capital let WeWork dominate prime locations and build a vertically integrated fit-out machine — buying furniture in bulk, managing construction itself — before competitors could respond.
- Selling identity along with desks, from a world-changing mission to We-branded living and schools, created evangelists among members and a workforce willing to work long hours for below-market pay.
- Flexible short-term leases met a real shift: freelancers and large companies wanted space without commitment, so rivals copied the offer even while questioning the valuation.
What it did
By mid-2019 WeWork had 466,000 members in 485 locations across 100-plus cities and 28 countries, revenue of $1.8 billion (up from $75 million in 2014), 22 million square feet of space, and a $47 billion valuation that made it America's most valuable start-up. It had become Manhattan's largest tenant, and the article credits it with reshaping commercial real estate — while noting it lost $1.9 billion in 2018 and that its adjusted-profit metric drew ridicule from the Financial Times.
What you can take
Reprice a commodity by changing what you sell — not square feet but flexibility, design and community. Capital follows the story; the danger is adjusted metrics replacing the economics underneath.
Since then
At the time of the June 2019 profile, the newly renamed We Company was trimming its sprawl: it cancelled Summer Camp, shelved ideas like WeSail and WeBank, and Neumann said he would sell the buildings he personally owned and leased to WeWork to the company's new ARK property fund at cost. WeLive had opened just two residences against an early projection of 69, and SoftBank's planned $16 billion investment had collapsed into $2 billion in December 2018. The article's open question — whether the machine could survive an economy that stopped expanding — remained unanswered.
Sources
- How Did WeWork's Adam Neumann Build a $47B Company?
- How Did WeWork's Adam Neumann Build a $47B Company? (Hacker News discussion)
spotted an error? The archive wants to know.
Your turn
You just read one. Describe the brief you are staring at, and see who has been given the same problem.
Free account · 3 free questions · no card