The archive · Business Models · Financial decision · 2009–2012
Kickstarter (2009): all-or-nothing crowdfunding lets fans fund creative projects
Kickstarter launched in 2009 with an all-or-nothing rule: pledges only charge if a project hits its goal — since then over $4 billion has been pledged.
Kickstarter
What it had to solve
Musician Perry Chen saw venues gamble on whether enough tickets would sell, and wanted that conditional logic applied to creative projects: 'if enough people pledge, it happens; if not, nobody pays.' In 2009 he, Yancey Strickler and Charles Adler launched a site for exactly that.
How it works
Kickstarter launched on 28 April 2009 with a deceptively simple contract: a creator sets a funding goal and a deadline of one to 90 days; backers pledge money in exchange for tiered rewards; if the goal is met, every credit card is charged and the creator receives the funds, less a 5% fee; if it falls short, all pledges are cancelled and nobody pays anything. The all-or-nothing rule was the product.
The idea came from co-founder Perry Chen, a New Orleans musician who watched venues gamble on ticket sales and wanted the same conditional logic for artists: if enough people commit, the project happens; if not, no one loses money. Chen, Yancey Strickler and Charles Adler built the site, which was invitation-only at first. The earliest projects were tiny — Drawing for Dollars, offering pencil sketches, raised $35 from three backers — and most projects still raise under $10,000.
The model scaled because it gave both sides what fixed pricing could not. By 2011, around 70 projects launched per day with a success rate below 45%, and a wristwatch for the iPod nano raised nearly $1 million in December 2010. In its first decade Kickstarter saw over $4 billion pledged across projects, games became its most-funded category with over $1 billion, and 15 Kickstarter-funded films received Oscar nominations.
Why it lands
- All-or-nothing removes the backer's risk: nobody pays unless the project is proven to have enough support, so pledging feels safe.
- The deadline creates urgency and gives creators a reason to promote hard, making each campaign a finite event instead of an open-ended ask.
- Reward tiers let fans pay more than a price for an object — they pay to be part of the project's origin story.
- Kickstarter only earns its 5% on success, aligning the platform's incentives with the creator's outcome.
- Limiting the site to creative projects gave it a clear identity that funders and makers could both rally around.
What it did
By 2011 the site ran about 70 new projects a day with a success rate under 45%, and a December 2010 project to make a wristwatch for the iPod nano raised nearly $1 million. Over its first decade more than $4 billion was pledged, games became its biggest category at over $1 billion, and 15 Kickstarter-funded films were nominated for Oscars.
What you can take
The all-or-nothing rule is the product: it removes the backer's risk, forces creators to pre-sell before spending, and turns every campaign into a deadline-driven event worth sharing.
Since then
Kickstarter produced the platform's first million-dollar projects in 2012 — the Elevation Dock, then Double Fine's Broken Age, which raised over $3 million — and went on to fund Cards Against Humanity, Oculus Rift, Pebble and thousands of films and games. Chen stepped down as CEO in 2019, and the term 'crowdfunding' became a category with imitators everywhere, but Kickstarter's threshold model stayed the reference design for creative funding.
Sources
spotted an error? The archive wants to know.
Your turn
You just read one. Describe the brief you are staring at, and see who has been given the same problem.
Free account · 3 free questions · no card