EN
Back to the archive

The archive · PR & Stunts · Marketing decision · 2024–2025

IKEA Canada's -13% 'Second-Hand Tax' zeroes out HST on used goods — 192% As-Is sales jump

Instead of complaining about Canada's double tax on used goods, IKEA charged itself a -13% Second-Hand Tax so As-Is buyers pay nothing.

IKEA Canada

The ideaAnnounce that IKEA is introducing a 'Second-Hand Tax' of -13% — a counter-tax that cancels Ontario's 13% HST so its own used As-Is items sell tax-free.substantial

What it had to solve

In Canada, 13% HST applies to every purchase, and IKEA discovered second-hand goods are taxed again every time they are resold — items that lose value never lose their tax, costing Canadians an estimated $720 million a year. As one of the country's largest sellers of used furniture, IKEA wanted affordability and sustainability to pull in the same direction.

How it works

In Canada, 13% HST is added to every sales transaction, and it has been since 1997. IKEA discovered a quiet absurdity inside that rule: second-hand goods are taxed again every time they are resold. A sofa loses its packaging, its price and much of its value, but it never loses its tax — every new owner pays HST that was already paid once before, an estimated $720 million a year flowing to the federal government.

IKEA was an unusual complainant: its As-Is corners and Sellback Programme make it one of Canada's biggest retailers of used furniture. Instead of protesting in a manifesto, the company announced its own law. SHT — Second-Hand Tax — is a counter-tax of -13%, exactly cancelling Ontario's HST. From 2 April 2024, the start of Earth Month, customers in IKEA's Ontario As-Is marketplaces effectively paid zero tax on second-hand items, and the cheeky name (read aloud, it sounds like an expletive) made the point impossible to ignore.

The campaign opened with an open letter in the Globe and Mail, Financial Post, Toronto Star and Ottawa Citizen, then spread through store signage, Instagram and TikTok, a LinkedIn post from the CEO and a change.org petition. IKEA also went directly to the people with power: it lobbied tax and retail organisations, wrote to federal and provincial stakeholders, and convened more than 100 leaders from business, government and civil society to discuss the change.

The numbers followed. SHT collected more than 32,000 petition signatures (Edelman later put it above 35,000), lifted purchase intent to 81%, raised IKEA's sustainability perception by 11%, and drove a 192% increase in As-Is sales and 16% more foot traffic. It became the most covered campaign in IKEA Canada's history and the country's biggest bipartisan tax-law debate in years — and federal decision-makers agreed to meet IKEA to discuss ending double taxation on second-hand goods.

Why it lands

  • Making the counter-tax real inside its own stores turned an abstract policy into something customers could feel at the till.
  • The -13% framing inverted the argument: IKEA did not beg for a tax break, it enacted the fair tax itself and invited the country to follow.
  • The SHT name carried the campaign: polite on paper, it read like an expletive, so the issue travelled as a joke people repeated.
  • By targeting citizens and lawmakers at once, IKEA converted outrage into signatures, coverage and a seat at the policy table rather than just impressions.

What it did

SHT became the most covered campaign in IKEA Canada's history and ignited the biggest bipartisan tax-law debate in years: more than 32,000 petition signatures, purchase intent of 81%, a 192% increase in As-Is sales and 16% more store foot traffic. IKEA became the first consumer brand in Canada to propose tax-law change, and federal and provincial decision-makers agreed to discuss ending the double tax; the work won AICP's 'Most Next' top prize and Strategy Marketing Awards Golds.

Case pageEdelman — IKEA Canada SHT case

What you can take

Make the policy the punchline: instead of campaigning against a tax, IKEA enacted the absurd counter-tax itself — the brand became living proof of the change it wanted.

Since then

Through 2024 the petition and press kept building, and by 2025 Edelman reported over 35,000 signatures while federal and provincial decision-makers remained in talks about ending the double tax nationwide. AICP Next Awards 2025 gave the campaign its 'Most Next' top prize plus honours in PR and Creative Commerce, and Strategy's Marketing Awards 2025 brought two Golds and two Bronzes. Its legacy is the template: a retailer showing that a brand can change how a country taxes sustainability by rewriting the rule on its own price tag.

Sources

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

Your turn

You just read one. Describe the brief you are staring at, and see who has been given the same problem.

Free account · 3 free questions · no card

Related cases