The archive · Work & Ways of Doing · Operational decision · 2011–2014
Atos's 2011 'zero email' bid cut internal mail 60% — and made email itself the enemy
Atos vowed to eradicate internal email, switched staff to social-collaboration tools, and by 2014 had cut internal mail 60%, igniting a global debate.
Atos
What it had to solve
Atos ran on email across 42 countries; its Wellbeing@work surveys showed overload — in some teams email ate an estimated 30–40% of working time. CEO Thierry Breton called the data flow 'fast polluting our working environments' and declared that internal email had to go.
How it works
In February 2011 Thierry Breton, chief executive of French IT services group Atos, declared war on internal email. He called the flood of data 'fast polluting our working environments' and said only about 10% of the 200 messages employees received daily were useful, with 18% spam — so Atos, then roughly 74,000 people across 42 countries, would work toward eradicating internal email.
The push came out of Atos's Wellbeing@work programme: employees reported that email overload made them uncomfortable and that in some teams mail handling consumed an estimated 30–40% of working time. Rather than only exhorting people, Atos ran 'email etiquette' training, coached managers, and built a replacement stack it called ZEN — Microsoft SharePoint, Lync messaging and the BlueKiwi social network it acquired in 2012 — with profiles, presence and communities standing in for distribution lists.
Within six months internal email was down about 20%. By February 2014, the three-year mark, Atos said internal email had fallen 60% — to around 25 internal messages per mailbox a week — while more than 8,500 communities had appeared. The company framed the results as a fight against information overload rather than a literal zero: formal HR and legal notices still went by email.
The 'zero email' ambition sparked almost as much controversy as praise, as commentators debated whether email could really be retired. Atos's answer was that email was never the true target: the goal was changing how 76,000 people across 52 countries chose tools, so collaboration happened in places that left a record.
Why it lands
- A named, extreme target ('zero email') turned a vague complaint about overload into a company-wide programme with a deadline.
- Behaviour came before tools: email etiquette training and manager coaching changed defaults before the new stack arrived.
- Communities with profiles and presence made expertise findable — replacing distribution lists and, in Atos's words, 'made Atos small again'.
- The company measured and published the drop (60%, about 25 emails a week) instead of claiming a cosmetic victory.
What it did
At the three-year mark internal email was down 60% — to around 25 internal messages per mailbox a week by mid-2014 — and 8,500+ collaboration communities had replaced distribution lists; the campaign became a global talking point in the fight against information overload.
What you can take
Pick a visible, named enemy: Atos never reached zero email, yet the polarising target changed behaviour at scale — a loud direction plus new defaults moved real work out of the inbox.
Since then
By 2014 Atos said it had no ambition to drive email to zero or ten; around 20–25 internal messages a week was a level employees no longer felt as overload, and formal matters such as HR and legal notices still went by email. Atos pushed on toward what it called a 'fully collaborative organization', using communities to reorganise global service desks of 2,000–3,000 people with a target of 20% higher productivity, and kept working on information-overload tools under the Wellbeing@work umbrella.
Sources
spotted an error? The archive wants to know.
Your turn
You just read one. Describe the brief you are staring at, and see who has been given the same problem.
Free account · 3 free questions · no card